About this site

Download of

Publications Presentations Free software

The Nucleus Approach

Introduction

Nucleus and SME statistics

Statements of chambers and SMEs

Impact: What changed? Interview with Jordi Castan

Sustainability

Legal property of the Nucleus Approach

Nucleus

Definition

Types of Nuclei

Manual for the Nucleus

The start

9 criteria for the selection of a sector

How to kill a Nucleus

Chambers and Associations

Lobby and Public Private Dialogue

Benchmarking of chambers

7.        Financing / Subsidizing Nuclei and Associations

The chambers cooperation project in Brazil subsidized neither individual enterprises nor Nuclei or chambers[1]; if the entrepreneurs are convinced of something then they will find ways of financing it. This, however, is different in Sri Lanka, where there is prevalence – boosted by government and donors – to expect grants (“recipient mentality”). But even there the entrepreneurs have arrived started saying “We do not bother about the subsidies. We need the Nucleus!”

The question is how and what to subsidize on the basis of which reasons – all the while re­inforcing, not counteracting the orientation of the Nucleus Approach.

  • Subsidizing individual entrepreneurs is in diametrical contrast to the Nucleus Approach and should be done under no circumstances. On the one hand, having access to individual subsidies automatically reduces the entrepreneurs’ interest and motivation to engage themselves in a Nucleus and chamber; on the other hand it undermines their self-help efforts. They will not do what they think is good for the enterprise but what they think will be subsidized.

  • Subsidizing Nucleus activities can be argued for as a means of motivating the initially distrustful entrepreneur to try out participation in a Nucleus by reducing the barriers to entry as low as possible. With agreed upon promotion guidelines defining the rights and obligations of Nucleus members, chambers and the project, activities can be promoted in the field of training, consultancies, visits to enterprises and other institutions relevant to the entrepreneur, marketing, fairs and expositions and possibly also investment into hardware up to certain limits. Even small activities can be subsidized in a fast way with a decision taking board that includes representatives of the involved chambers. Easy to handle standardized forms for applications, contracts statements and reports keep the administrative costs relatively low.[2]

  • Subsidies shall gradually decrease (exit strategy) in expectation of the entrepreneurs’ growing awareness of the importance of the Nucleus for them, so that they are prepared to finance the activities by themselves or search for other financial sources.

  • Performance oriented subsidization of chamber overhead costs: The establishment of Nuclei involves additional costs (personnel, physical infrastructure etc.), which initially the chambers are not able to cover.
    It has been successful to subsidize according to the motto “subsidies against performance”. In Sri Lanka, the criteria “number of active Nuclei” and “number of Nucleus members paying membership fee” worked w
    ell.[3]     
    This system has a further advantage for the project in that current costs do not have to be accounted and paid for, nor controlled by the project staff – a process that easily invites manipulation. Only the number of Nuclei and their members needs to be monitored.
    [4]


[1]    SEBRAE later changed this during national dissemination of the approach by temporarily financing costs of the chambers.

[2]    ESSP agreed with the Sri Lankan chambers that these or the Nucleus entrepreneurs prefinance the activities. The project pays the subsidy only after the execution of the activity against presentation of the report and the original receipts. This dispenses with the management of advance payments, which as a rule causes a lot of administrative work.

[3]    An additional criterion might be the membership fee, so as to exert pressure for introducing a more efficient membership fee system which would contribute to the chamber’s own funds while taking the members’ differing economic strength into account (In Sri Lanka, for example, up to now all members pay the same fee, like in a club).

[4]    In Sri Lanka the overhead cost subsidies of six chambers with about 1,000 Nucleus enterprises amounted to around 12.000 € in 2005.